School today, didn’t do anything but make this poster for our design and art classes at our school for the orientation thing their doing tonight for all of the new kids and stuff coming in next year.
I’m not the best artist and I’m really lazy (especially at school) but I care a lot about design and getting others into it so I put a bunch of effort into this for a change.
Took the picture on my phone and raised the contrast so it’s not the best quality. Ill get a better one later.

School today, didn’t do anything but make this poster for our design and art classes at our school for the orientation thing their doing tonight for all of the new kids and stuff coming in next year.

I’m not the best artist and I’m really lazy (especially at school) but I care a lot about design and getting others into it so I put a bunch of effort into this for a change.

Took the picture on my phone and raised the contrast so it’s not the best quality. Ill get a better one later.

capplum

2spookywendigo:

jabbaduhutt:

russian-tupperware:

aetropos:

yeahyeahno:

chicksdigthephoenix:

super-scout:

aetropos:

starexorcist:

tehmostaewsumblogevar:

starexorcist:

ecrusher:

10knotes:

M&Ms Droplets

now that’s what photography should be about… not a black and white picture of someone’s shoes

image

image

The top picture is full of M&M’s. They’re bule, red, orange, green, yellow, and brown.

image

But in the bottom picture we clearly see there’s white, pink, and even purple candies in the bowl.

image

The bottom picture is of gumballs! This concludes that the bottom picture is not taken with that camera at all. I’d even go as far to say that it was edited in photoshop with a filter!

image

image

Yes the above image and the below image are not the same photograph being taken. This is rather obvious.

image

BUT Mr. Wright there is one thing you overlooked. Examine the droplets on the bottom image. None of them are from the same angle. This is a natural occurance when looking through water droplets.

Is it not possible that the photographer took the second image first?

image

Would it not be more probable that when asked HOW it was taken he/she took the above image of their setup Using M&Ms, something much more common in a household rather than many gumballs, something they may have just bought for the original photo?

So to claim it was not taken with the same camera is indeed a long shot Mr. Wright.

image

Thank you for your time.

image

Really Edgeworth, is that you’re argument.

image

Aren’t you overlooking the fact that there are no pink M&Ms. This proves undeniably that these are not, in fact M&Ms, but some other kind of candy.

image

And one other thing, I find it highly improbable that not one piece of candy is facing so the M logo is on the candy.

image

So in conclusion, there is no way these are possibly M&Ms.

image

hey mister I think you’re confuuuuuuused. Edgeworth agreed that they weren’t M&M’s. He was just refuting that there is a possibility there wasnt any photoshop used and that the above image was only depicting the method used in the bottom image.

image

I think someone might be getting a little senile hehehe

image

image

image

image

Everyone seems to be walking around the accusations by examining whether they are or aren’t M&Ms. That is not what’s important. What we should be looking at is instead, the so-called droplets, compared to the background image.

image

image

The angles within the droplets do not realistically coincide with one another! As well, I don’t spend much time staring at drops of water, but I can surely say I’ve never seen such clarity in any water droplet. Also, as in the former picture, there is an obvious fogging on the glass, surely caused by whichever process was used to spray the water. Where is the fog?

image

On top of all that, the drops are amazingly tiny compared to the anonymous-candy. One could argue the sheet is further away than in the ‘example’ pic, but the blurring of the candies definitely objects to that. We could also try to assume that the spray method used in the ‘original’ photo caused much tinier water spots, but are we to believe that the photographer was so careless that they couldn’t recreate the correct droplet size in the ‘example’? Surely, they should have been able to cause at least a closer resemblance.

image

Sure seems like they went out of their way to showcase the methodology of how the photograph was taken, yet neglected to go far enough to ensure it could be a like-comparison?

image

image

Rather unlikely!

image

Actually, Mr. Godot!!

image

Well, according to the properties of light and the way it’s refracted…

image

image

If you mirror it the right way, they line up just fine!

image

Aah… these M&M’s droplets

image

So colourful… reminds me of the days of my youth!

image

the red ones remind me of my hemorroids… *cough*

image

image

I have found some new evidence though the original image source suggesting this second image has been tampered with!

image

This image clearly shows candies that correspond to the colours commonly found in M & M s…  The edge of the bowl is visible, as are some ‘M’ symbols, if you look closely.

image

This suggests the second image in the original is perhaps just a fabrication based off of the second.

image

Therefore…

It is clearly a fraud!

image

image

You shouldn’t jump the “fraud” gun just yet, Wright. If your source is really the corresponding photo to the first, then the “gumball” picture in question might not be at fault. To put it bluntly, it might just be a copycat.

image

To put it another way, this could just be a case of a mistaken and mismatched photoset..

image

With all the evidence provided, I think it’s safe to assume this case could be solved: The candies in the second photograph are not M&Ms, but the photo itself was not exactly tampered with. It was just a completely separate photo of separate candies, possibly just misplaced in this set by the original poster, who was completely unaware of the mismatch!

image

Hold it right there everyone.

There is..

image

A PUZZLE HIDDEN IN THAT BOWL OF MISLEADING CANDY.

I cannot, not reblog this. It is amazing!

OH. MY. FUCKING. GOD.

rokkan

purplekecleon:

floraverse:

FOXBAT (also on Deviantart)

Common elements: Foxbats are highly versatile, and there have been several documented sightings of them possessing one or two of most every elemental affinity. The few elements that Foxbats are not noted as often possessing seem to be Spirit, and all of its subtypes.

Hereditary magic: The word “volatile” could be used to describe the Foxbat’s aptitude for passing down hereditary affinities, and for obtaining or becoming influenced by environmental affinities. Foxbat parents nearly always pass down their affinities to their offspring, regardless of if the parents consisted of one Foxbat or two. If the offspring are raised in an environment that does not match their hereditary affinity, their affinity will most likely change before they reach adulthood. This may not be accompanied by an overt physical change, but will instead most likely reveal itself in future generations.

Elemental weaknesses/resistances: Foxbats have no notable weaknesses or resistances by themselves, rather, they depend on whether or not their affinity makes them susceptible to or resistant against certain elements. Foxbats that have no affinity whatsoever are usually weak to any sort of magical assault, save for Air and its subtypes, which they are often neutral to.

Common locations: Due to their curious and friendly nature, most Foxbats are found wherever villages, towns, and cities are. They can also be found almost everywhere in Owel, with no real exception. They have been spotted in the most desolate reaches of Auroria, around the toxic swamps of Neck-Deep Mire, deep underground in Candy Rock and Miaoustok, and even the smaller islands of Heaven’s Keys.

Climate preference: Like weaknesses and resistances, the climate or environmental preference of the Foxbat usually depends on its affinity, although personal choice is also a factor. Foxbats without an affinity usually prefer wide, open areas with gentle winds, moderate temperatures, and ample sunshine. Examples would include the forests surrounding Dewclaw Flats, most of the United Gnoll Nation territories, and Citrico Archipelago during its calm weather seasons.

Sentience: Most Foxbats are feral, and are often kept as pets or trained to perform simple tasks, the most popular being delivering mail. They are highly intelligent, and will often form strong bonds with their handlers and all others who choose to treat them kindly. In very rare cases, a Foxbat does possess sentience. These individuals may not necessarily speak any recognized language or be familiar with any civilized mannerisms, and as such may be mistaken for a feral Foxbat.

Language: Foxbats are able to communicate amongst each other, and are able to learn words and simple commands if trained properly. Sentient Foxbats can converse with feral Foxbats, and they also have no difficulty in learning any other language.

Trivia: Foxbats are not native to Owel, instead having been imported from the continent of Jewell several centuries ago. Many modern-day Owel inhabitants do not remember this fact, nor would it matter to them. Foxbats are popular as pets, as they are highly friendly, curious, and usually fairly intelligent for a non-sentient animal. Foxbats are at times born without sight, with this usually occurring in approximately one out of every ten to fifteen Foxbats. These blind Foxbats almost always have some sort of ability, affinity, or some heightened sense that allows them to live their lives normally, or without much handicap. Nearly all Foxbats prefer a diet of either fruits, bugs, or both fruits and bugs, although some carnivorous specimens have been rumoured to exist.

Sentient Foxbats do exist, although very rarely, and are most often found to possess an affinity for Spirit or any of its subtypes. These Foxbats are almost never found in large, populated cities, as they are most often thought of as oddities, or even worse, as pets to be coddled and trained. They prefer instead to live in less densely populated areas, examples being small villages in Dewclaw Flats, the Lucky Cloud Cities, or the Village of Good Intentions. Sentient Foxbats should be treated the same as any other sentient race, as there is no difference between them, save for public perception.

Goal is a species a day until we have at least 10!

plithith

plithith:

lights-over-arbys:

rubynrags:

Do you know what I want to see?

I wanna see a really cool Disney princess who can’t sing. I wanna see this pretty young girl who sounds like a beached whale when she tries to sing “Happy Birthday.” And none of the musical numbers feature her because she doesn’t sing.

But halfway through the movie, she figures out

She can rap like hell

This post kept getting better and better with every word

YESSSSSSSSS please

capplum

tinycartridge:

If Link’s Awakening were made today ⊟

It would probably have more colors than green, though! The re-imagined screenshot comes from Jonatan Iversen-Ejve, who illustrated this for Swedish magazine LEVEL (via gamover mx981). I’m not too enamored with the art style in Iversen-Ejve’s version — it seems a bit too Triple Towns-ish to me — but I’d welcome a remake for Link’s Awakening.

If Nintendo was able to transform the second-best Zelda into the wonderful, modern masterpiece that was A Link Between Worlds, just think what the company could do with the series best entry.

BUY Zelda: A Link Between Worlds, upcoming games

Shut up and take my rupees!!

rokkan

ridge:

i want to ask why but im not